Skip to content
Ashdreams

  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Podcasts
  • Reels
  • Home
  • About Us
  • Contact Us
  • Podcasts
  • Reels
  • GST

    GST and Expatriate Employees – They Are Employees First

    March 17, 2026 - By Ashdreams

    Author: Ashwarya Sharma, Advocate | Co-Founder & Legal Head, RB LawCorpDate: 17/03/2026 Introduction: When Employment Is Mistaken for Supply The taxation of cross-border employment arrangements under GST has been a recurring area of dispute, particularly in cases involving multinational corporations deploying expatriate employees in India. A key controversy has been…

    Continue Reading
  • GST

    Rooh Afza, Residuary Entries and the Revival of Classification Principles: A Landmark VAT Ruling by the Supreme Court

    March 6, 2026 - By Ashdreams

    Author: Ashwarya Sharma, Advocate | Co-Founder & Legal Head, RB LawCorpDate: 05/03/2026 Introduction: When Classification Determines Tax Fate Classification disputes have long occupied a central place in indirect tax jurisprudence, often determining the fiscal fate of entire industries. The recent decision of the Supreme Court in Hamdard (Wakf) Laboratories vs…

    Continue Reading
  • GST

    ISD vs Cross Charge: Karnataka HC Settles the Pre-Amendment Controversy

    March 3, 2026 - By Ashdreams

    Author: Ashwarya Sharma, Advocate & Co-Founder, RB LawCorpDate: 02/03/2026 Introduction: When Procedure Is Mistaken for Prohibition The architecture of GST rests upon the promise of seamless credit. Yet, in practice, few issues have generated as much controversy as the mechanism for distribution of common input service credit between distinct registrations…

    Continue Reading
  • GST

    Raid, Record & Reliance: Electronic Evidence, Admissions and the Consequence of Non-Retracted Statements under Customs & GST

    February 25, 2026 - By Ashdreams

    Author: Ashwarya Sharma, Advocate & Co-Founder, RB LawCorpDate: 25/02/2026 Introduction: When Seizure Is Mistaken for Admissibility Search and seizure proceedings under fiscal statutes have increasingly become technology-driven. Laptops, accounting software backups, server extracts, pen drives and cloud data now form the backbone of many customs and GST demands. Yet a fundamental evidentiary…

    Continue Reading
  • GST

    Regulation is not Commerce: Why Statutory Fees collected by Regulators cannot be taxed under GST

    February 13, 2026 - By Ashdreams

    Author: Ashwarya Sharma, Advocate & Co-Founder, RB LawCorpDate: 13/02/2026 Introduction: When Regulation Is Mistaken for Revenue Few debates under GST have generated as much conceptual confusion as the attempt to tax statutory or regulatory fees collected by bodies discharging sovereign functions. At the heart of this controversy lies a foundational constitutional question:…

    Continue Reading
  • GST

    Tax Sovereignty in an Unsettled World: A GST Practitioner’s Reading of Tiger Global and the Future of Fiscal Autonomy

    February 10, 2026 - By Ashdreams

    Author: Ashwarya Sharma, Advocate & Co-Founder, RB LawCorpDate: 10/02/2026 1. Introduction The concept of tax sovereignty has re-emerged as a defining theme in contemporary fiscal discourse. In an era shaped by cross-border capital flows, multilateral tax frameworks, and increasing economic interdependence, the power to design and enforce tax policy has assumed renewed…

    Continue Reading
  • GST

    Reasserting Judicial Independence: Supreme Court Strikes Down the Tribunal Reforms Act,2021 – Implications for the GST Appellate Tribunal

    November 22, 2025 - By Ashdreams

    Supreme Court Strikes Down Tribunal Reforms Act, 2021 — Major Implications for GST Appellate Tribunal (GSTAT) Author: Ashwarya Sharma, Advocate & Co-Founder, RB LawCorpDate: 20/11/2025 The Supreme Court’s landmark judgment dated 19 November 2025 in Madras Bar Association v. Union of India has once again reaffirmed that judicial independence is…

    Continue Reading
  • GST - TAX

    A welcome judgement

    April 30, 2025 - By Ashdreams

    SC Greenlights Rectification of GST Errors Post-Deadline In a landmark ruling in CBIC vs. Aberdare Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (2025-TIOL-16-SC-GST), the Supreme Court upheld the Bombay High Court’s verdict allowing correction of bonafide GST return errors beyond the statutory deadline. ? Background:Aberdare filed its returns on time but later found clerical…

    Continue Reading
  • GST

    Supreme Court’s Landmark Ruling on Arrest Powers Under GST and Customs Acts: Balancing Enforcement with the Fundamental Right to Life

    April 30, 2025 - By Ashdreams

    This article examines the Hon’ble Supreme Court’s recent ruling in Radhika Agarwal v. Union of India [2025] 171 taxmann.com 832 (SC) a landmark judgment with significant legal implications. The decision addresses the constitutional validity of arrest powers under Section 69 and the issuance of summons under Section 70 of the Central Goods and Services Tax (CGST) Act, along with…

    Continue Reading
  • GST - TAX

    Transitional Credit and Proper Officer; the Saga Continues

    April 30, 2025 - By Ashdreams

    An issue that generated majority of litigation in initial years of GST law (except of course the wrath of check post officers under sections 129 and 130 of the CGST Act) and consumed significant time of the High Court’s across the country was disputes around carry-forward of input tax credit/Cenvat…

    Continue Reading
 Older Posts
Newer Posts 

Recent Posts

  • When the Supplier Defaults: The Gujarat High Court Reopens the Great ITC Debate under GST
  • Contract Damages Are Not Supply: Reaffirming the Boundaries of GST in Breach of Contract Matters
  • Beyond Nomenclature: Substance Over Form in Employer–Employee Relationships under GST
  • Decoding Classification Under Customs Law: The Supreme Court’s Masterclass in Welkin Foods
  • GST Appellate Tribunal: Jurisdiction, Benches and Emerging Issues

Recent Comments

No comments to show.
Copyright © 2026 ashdreams.
Design and Developed by GIKS INDIA PVT. LTD.

In compliance with the rules of the Bar Council of India, this website is intended solely to provide general information about the professional activities of the individual and is not meant to advertise services or solicit clients. Nor is it to be construed as legal advice of any nature or manner whatsoever. Please read and accept our website’s Terms of Use and our Privacy Policy. By clicking on ‘I AGREE’ below, the website visitor acknowledges that the information provided in is meant only for his/her understanding about the individual and their professional background.